Go to Slide:  3  4  5  6  7  8  9


Slide 1

Online Academy

of Biblical Studies

Introduction To

Christian Evidences

Archaeology and the Bible 

Lesson 9a


Slide 2

Introduction:

We have examined three areas which lend evidence to the Bible being the Word of God: (1) The unity of the Bible; (2) The purity of Bible ethics and (3) Inspiration of the Bible.

We propose in this study to examine some of the external evidences from archaeology which show that the Bible is an accurate and historically trustworthy record.

Archaeology does not prove the Bible in the sense of It being God’s revelation or inspired of God.  However, it does give us factual proof of the accuracy of the Biblical accounts.

Archaeology corroborates, illustrates, illuminates and supplements the Biblical record.  Our confidence in the Bible is made greater by verification of Its accounts.

This gives us an additional proof to use in dealing with the skeptic who discredits the Biblical account.


Slide 3

What Is Biblical Archaeology?

Archaeology is a systematic study of ancient people as that life …can be learned by what they left behind (Jenkins).

It is the study of “tells” or mounds where ancient cities were destroyed and rebuilt time and time again on the same site.  

A “tell” is like a layer cake with different levels of dirt and debris from 1 to 5 feet in thickness representing a particular time in the history of the city or site occupants.

 

Archaeology is limited in that we have only a very small fraction of evidence. Areas of this limitation are: (1) What exists or survived the destruction of the city or place; (2) Not all sites are identified; and (3) Not all sites identified have been excavated.

Biblical Archaeology deals with places and sites that are mentioned in the Biblical text or Bible lands.


Slide 4

The Value of Archaeology


Slide 5

Documents & Monuments

Law Codes:

Vast Libraries:

Language Keys:


Slide 6

Examples From O.T. Period (1)

Moses wrote the Pentateuch – Ugaritic alphabet dating back 3,500 years has sequence of Hebrew alphabet.

Wine in Egypt – Herodotus disagreed with Gen. 40.  Tomb in Egypt has picture of them practicing viticulture.

David King of Israel - In 1993 Biram discovered a 3,000 year old obelisk with the phrase “house of David” 1 Kgs 12:19

Solomon’s Seaport – 1 Kgs 9:26  Ezion-geber  Glueck looked and found this seaport where the Bible placed it.

Queen of Sheba – 1 Kgs 10  Skeptics denied the existence until about 100 years ago when Marib the capital found.

Sargon – Isaiah 20  Skeptics denied his existence until his palace was excavated in 1843 and Tartan’s name was found at the site.


Slide 7

Examples From O.T. Period (2)

Babylonians and Daniel – tablet in British museum which gives exact information of the city of Jerusalem  2 Kings 24.

Daniel 1 – Babylonian captives never treated decently.

Daniel 3 – Never used lions to execute or punish.

Daniel 4 – Nebuchanezzar’s seven year madness denied.

Daniel 5 – Belshazzar was never king of Babylon and the city could not be taken so suddenly.  However, various sources support the account in Daniel as accurate:


Slide 8

Examples From N.T. Period

Luke’s accounts accurate.  Sir William Ramsey begin to follow form critics.  However his honest investigation led him to accept Luke’s accounts as accurate.  He concluded, “Luke is a historian of the first rank… Luke’s history is unsurpassed in respect of its trustworthiness.”

Geisler wrote of Luke’s accuracy, “In all, Luke names 32 countries, 54 cities and 9 islands without an error.”

The Pilate inscription – In 1961 Antonio Frova discovered a slab which shows Pilate was Prefect of Judea.

New Testament Coins:


Slide 9

Conclusion:

We have touched on only a very small amount of the overwhelming evidence which shows the historical accuracy and trustworthiness of the Biblical record.

The problems often associated with archaeology and the Bible stem not from the data itself, but from the incorrect handling of it or reliance upon false science, such as inaccurate dating methods, false assumptions or the inexact nature of this science.

The evidence of archaeology is in favor of the Bible.  Albright wrote that the “result is throughout favorable to the biblical record.”  True science and the Bible never contradict, they are always in harmony.